Hey Folks,

It’s that time of year once again. Thanks so much for stopping by to read the blog here and view the photos, I appreciate it.

Here are my pick of images (34) for 2011. I hope you enjoy them.

You’ll find a great list of photographers’ photos of the year on Jim Goldstein’s blog. Check it out.

Thanks

Cheers

Carl

Backcountry skiing on a ridge on Flat Top Mountain, Glen Alps, near Anchorage. Chugach State Park, winter, Alaska. Please click on the image above to view a larger version of the photo.

Hey Folks,

I recall a conversation or 2 on the subject of art and science; essentially, what differentiates and what connects the science and art. Art is exploration. Science is similar process with maybe more strictly defined boundaries. Certainly they’re both forms of creative expression.

I think the critical illustration of their differences is very simple; artists are so often WAY cool, and scientists way nerdy.

Cheers

Carl

I was photographing toward the mountains when 2 snowboarders came on by. I snapped this photo of one of them before he took off down the mountain. A snowboarder walks across the ridge near Flatop Mountain, Glen Alps, near Anchorage, in winter, Alaska. Mt. McKinley, known as "Denali" in the distance. Please click on the image above to view a larger version of this photo.

Hey folks,

A quick word of advice. If you think it looks like a nice afternoon to go out and shoot some photos (i.e., the light is rockin’, fresh snow on the mountaintops, etc, etc, etc), the very best of advice I might offer you is this: Head out on your own.

I know better than to think I might do some photography when I head out with non-photographers. Well, I like to THINK I know better, but I today did it yet again. Sometimes I’m a just a flatout non-learner, I guess.

So, as the setting sun turned the sky and nearby mountains a glorious pink, instead of photographing the grandeur, I was packed up and skiing my way back to the parking lot, my camera and tripod safely tucked away inside my daypack.

Photography and non-photographers just don’t mix well. The first time I was given this lesson was years ago, in a discussion with the late Bill Silliker, Jr (a  great photographer and a good man); we were talking about being a photographer versus being a musician. Bill had been a drummer in his younger days. His words were “Carl, one of the best things, for me, about photography as a gig is that I don’t need a bass player”.

Not only do photographers not need a bass player, they do better without them. Much better. Drummers, not so much.

So, the lesson, as I need to be reminded, is that if I want to photograph, and photograph well, I do a whole lot better to head off on my own (or with other photographers). So, anyway – next time I think it might be a good afternoon to do some skiing and bring my camera along to shoot a little late light, alpenglow and mountains, I’ll make sure I’m not on a curfew.

Cheers

Carl

PS – Oh, and hey look , there’s Denali in the distance.

Hey Folks,

One of the crazier things at the start of the Iditarod is the costumes and outfits some people go for. I am posting these 3 images not because they were the craziest of the outfits but because all 3 people, later in the day whilst walking through the park, were apparently fired upon by Alaska Fish and Game Board predator-control snipers in passing airplanes.

No casualties recorded.

Cheers

Carl

Hey Folks,

It’s that crazy time of the year again – Iditarod 2009. The ceremonial start of the race was held this morning, downtown Anchorage, and the weather was perfect – perfect for me, not so perfect for the dogs. The dogs like it colder than I do, strangely enough – but they’re probably working harder. This photo is Lance Mackey, winner of the last 2 Iditarod races, and a favorite for this year as well. Unfortunately I’ll be in the backcountry and not following the race too closely, but I’ll try to check in and see how the race shape up. It’d be way cool if Lance makes it 3 in a row.

Cheers

Carl

Hey Folks,

The last 10 days have been pretty busy, as I’ve been doing the Wilderness First Responder course (note to self: don’t let your certifications lapse in the future). One of the primary goals of the course is to teach participants basic life support in backcountry and wilderness settings. Here my friend Lisa is holding her patient’s head stable to protect the patient (Jason) from spine injury. Both hands on the head, holding it still and steady, are critical. You can see in this simulation Lisa, with help from her other rescuer, has the patient warm and dry in a sleeping bag, on a foam pad to help insulate him. Jason was found lying in the pool you can see near his feet. Lisa and Taylor did a safety drag, where the spine is immobilized and Jason was dragged out of the water, on to the pad, they cut his wet clothes off, rolled him onto his side, placed a sleeping bag under him, rolled him back down and zipped up the bag. In no time at all, he was dry and warm. That’s a HUGE deal, as any treatment in this situation is going to (in all probability) be a minimum of several hours, and hypothermia will most likely set in. Hypothermia can affect people even when the ambient temperature is 65˚F (18.3˚ C) – so for someone with a possible major injury, lying flat on the ground for a short period of time even in mild weather can easily induce hypothermia. Get the patient dry, off the ground, and in a bag.

Cheers

Carl

hey Folks,

Here’s another from the start of the Iditarod in Anchorage, March 1, 2008. It doesn’t seem like that long ago, and here the month has flown by. I wanted to get a shot or 2 of some interaction between the dogs and heir handlers, but they were typically not in decent light. Finally got a few that I was happy with. This one, the handler knelt down to check the dog’s booties, and he got a face full of tongue for his trouble. Seconds later the starter said “Go”, and the dogs were gone!

Cheers

Carl

Hey Folks,

A recent thread on global warming and other environmental issues posed the question: “Are we having fun yet?” What a fantastic question to ask of ourselves in the year 2008. This question hit me square between the eyes; that’s really the issue here, isn’t it, I thought. That’s exactly what’s going on. Recent years have given more people more access to more goods and services, more art, more sport, more information, even to more other people, than ever before. With the internet we have access to the entire world at our fingertips. I can learn about almost anything in a matter of minutes. I can order plated Patagonian Alpaca Wool rugs in a few seconds, with the click of a mouse. I can order Goat’s Milk chocolate from Israel in the time it takes me to write this sentence. Figuratively, we have everything, literally we have more than anyone has ever had before. We live, in every sense of the word, in a time of abundance. And yet we seem bent on ‘more’. Why aren’t we happy yet, I wondered. (note: before you read on, this gets kinda long)

We work harder and longer, producing ever higher yields of ‘stuff’, reducing both our time for leisure and social relations, 2 primary sources of happiness, and replaced those with hours spent commuting, working, producing and consuming. Ironically enough, these have all been shown NOT to produce happiness. They have, ironically, been linked to depression, to stress, to nervousness, to anxiety, to anger, and that root of all evil, fear. As consumers fill their homes with more and increasingly expensive items such as motorboats and jewellery and high definition TVs and third or fourth cars, they spend ever-increasing dollars on burglar alarm systems and private security guards.

What’s all this got to do with nature photography? Well, it’s got a lot to do with nature, that much is certain. Our compulsive consumption engenders much less of what we call ‘nature’, and many, many more strip malls. We’ve replaced an incredible biodiversity with urban sprawl and office parks and monocrops. As someone who would rather photograph herds of bison than buyers, mountain ridges than city skylines and old growth forests over concrete jungles, that’s something I worry about.

Let’s look briefly at some stats of the last few centuries in the United States of America (this is simply a few – we could look at countless more):

We’ve consumed:

* Approx 60-100 million bison.
* Flocks of passenger pigeons once numbering in the billions (Billions, with a B, as in “B-I-L-L-I-O-N-S)
* The Great Auk, once found from Canada to Norway, and as far south as Florida and Southern Spain
* Stellar’s Sea Cow, first identified by western explorers in 1741, extinct 30 years later.
* Eastern elk, wiped out so quickly we still don’t know exactly where they once roamed and where they did not.
* Carolina parakeet, a gorgeous bird , exctinct because their bright plumage made them (apparently) excellent target practice.
* The innoncent beaver, nearly extinct in the eastern US by 1800, and nationwide by 1930 (fortunately the population has been granted a stay of execution and numbers are rebounding.
* Sea otters, once numbering nearly 300 000, reduced to 1-2000 animals by 1800, (currently c. 8000).
* 7th highest rate of primary forest loss in the world – by the mid 1800s, nearly all of the indigenous forest along the eastern seaboard was gone.
* The United States is both the world’s leading producer and consumer of forest products.
* In 1997, the U.S. consumed 99 million tons of paper and paperboard products, or 738 pounds per person. We consume more than 30% of the worlds paper.
* In 1990 over 12 000 new products hit the shelves in the US. This number is in the vicinity of 30 000 at this time. That’s over 80 new products on the shelves every single day.
* The USA constitutes 5% of the world’s population and consumes 25% of the energy. That same 5% has more environmental impact than the 51% that live in the other 5 largest countries. The United States is the world’s largest single emitter of carbon dioxide, accounting for 23 percent of energy-related carbon emissions worldwide.

Rather than being satiated, we seem bent on consuming more. We now import more products than we export. Living in one of the richest landmasses in the world, we import products (and services) for our consumption. An ever increasing number of Americans earning in excess of $100 000 annually, describe their situation as “barely able to make ends meet”. They live a lifestyle that most of the world’s population would describe as ‘luxurious’ and yet they feel as if they’re barely able to make ends meet. People in the US today are, on average, 4.5 times richer than their great grandparents were at the start of the last century, but they’re not 4.5 times happier. Something’s awry, my friends, something’s very awry.

Rather than go on, I think it’s useful to examine this and see what it might perhaps point to. Before I do, however, I want to be as clear as possible. I’m not bashing the US. Even a cursory examination shows that the same is true, to a lesser degree, for many places today, especially those in which most of our cultural roots were spawned. The desertification of the Middle East occurred long before overpopulation was a problem. Most of western Europe lost how much wildlife over a thousand years ago? Where are the shadows of the bears, the wolves, the lions, the bison, etc, that roamed European countryside long ago? Though the ‘problem’ isn’t exclusive to the USA, it’s perhaps most clearly manifest here for of a number of different reasons, one of which is simply timing – the incredible abundance of this landbase hadn’t been exploited by Western Civilization because nobody knew it existed until relatively recently. That discovery coincided with an Industrial Revolution of unprecedented magnitude; this incredibly plentiful new world, if indeed it really is our oyster, was quickly shucked and chugged.

What is this compulsion to consume? Where does it come from? How can we shake it? What are the side effects, if any, of this disorder? I’ll take a stab at answering just a few of the countless questions that seem to spring to mind when we consider this situation.

Is it an addiction?

It certainly appears to fit the clinical definition of addition. Our seeming inability to cease such behavioral patterns in the face of overwhelming evidence of their destructive nature clearly fit the clinical definition of addiction or compulsion (more on the ‘destructive nature’ point later). When behavior continues in spite of our knowledge of the destruction it brings, often to family, work and social relationships, most therapists define that as compulsive or addictive behavior. We have consumed over 90% of the large fish in the world’s oceans, and continue unabated in our relentless pursuit of those that remain. An international team of ecologists and economists tell us they expect the world’s oceans to be devoid of fish by the year 2048, (“This isn’t predicted to happen. This is happening now,” study researcher Nicola Beaumont, PhD, of the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, U.K., says in a news release. “If biodiversity continues to decline, the marine environment will not be able to sustain our way of life. Indeed, it may not be able to sustain our lives at all,” Beaumont adds.). In the past 300 years, researchers have documented the global extinction of just 21 marine species — but 16 have occurred since 1972. Overfishing threatens the health of an entire ecosystem because it targets important fish species that play major roles in recycling nutrients. We KNOW what’s going on. We’re aware of the situation, and the dire predictions cast by those who work most closely with the ecologies at stake. Before you cry ‘theories”, or “unproven”, remember that one of the hallmark symptoms of an addiction is denial.

* Denial: Chellis Glendinning writes: “the practicing alcoholic pretends that everything is normal and holds up appearances at all costs”. The US govt denies a link between global warming and out environmental impact. The medical establishment denies environmental illnesses, corporations deny environmental impact, consumers deny the impact of their lifestyles, and are similarly dishonest with regard to veracity of their “need” for a new iPhone.

* Disconnection From Feelings: Our modern lifestyle, with its fragmentation of order and compartmentalization of relationships yields a disconnection of feelings, experiences and perceptions from one another. Repressed feelings reside deep in the unconscious mind, hidden from view. Our embrace of technology, giving us virtual reality, is a classic example of how disconnected we remain from the way we feel. Widespread drug use, both as recreational tools and prescribed medicinal treatments for so many “mental” ailments reflect an unwillingness to accept and engage what we feel. The more disconnected we are from these feelings, in many cases, the easier it is to remain functional in a dysfunctional world.

* Dishonesty: When confronted with the inevitable truth of ecological devastation and enormous present and potential impact of modern humanity, we immediately leap to typical responses. The ‘problem’ is someone else’s. It’s not our fault, but always someone else’s. There is no problem, your facts are incorrect. I’ll be gone by then. Me changing my life wont’ change anything anyway. And so on.

Other symptoms include control (self-explanatory, really), thinking disorders (if we can just buy one more shiny new toy, all will be right with the world, or we mustn’t slow down because it’ll hurt the great deity, the ‘market economy’ – like any addict, we defer to the greatest of excuses, that we can’t change what we do because we depend on what is wrong) and delusions of grandiosity (technology and better sound ‘ecological management’ WON’T save us, friends).

3 Stages of addiction are:

Stage 1 – Internal Change: the addiction provides a sense of escape from their problems. A dependency develops, and we start to move away from people and towards the addictive experience.
Stage 2: Lifestyle Change: life becomes built around the addiction. Behavior becomes out of control. People are either directly involved with the addictive behavior or they’re constantly thinking about it.
Stage 3: Life Breakdown: addicts believe everything would be all right if you just leave them alone. Total breakdown often ensues.

If we apply these 3 stages to our culture, it’s easy to see how clearly we fit the model. Stage 1 – We started, long ago, to move away from people, from relationships, from the natural world, and towards the addictive experience centuries ago. Money, for example, or gold, or power, became so sought after that nations of people have been wiped out, species driven extinct and entire ecosystems destroyed. Stage 2 – Our behavior IS out of control – if it weren’t, we’d have no problem changing it. Our lives are absolutely built around our addiction for more, particularly in ‘developed countries’, where the addiction is most deeply rooted. Stage 3 – Total breakdown; some would propose we’re there already, or very close to it. Richard Duncan of the Olduvai Theory suggests we’ve not long to go. Peak Oil is another term referencing a possible manifestation of this stage. Global warming proponents point to another.

Systemic collective addiction, though much like individual addiction, is a relatively new realm of study. Being human, we like to pigeon hole and categorize or label everything, so we refer to these 2 processes as separate things, but the reality is they’re most likely simply different manifestations of the same dynamic. Our individual addictions may manifest themselves in alcohol, tobacco, drugs, gambling, sex, food, people, etc. Our collective addiction to consumption, manifest in a variety of products/services – oil, gold, currency, power, technology, prestige, careers, etc, is that not very different, in every aspect. Simply, we’re addicted to ‘more’, we suffer a systemic quest for ‘more’; be it more ice cream, more alcohol, more drugs, more technology, more information, more knowledge, more megapxiels, more freedom, more war, more religion, more money, more whatever. It’s all the same thing, it’s ALL rooted in the external, as if our salvation lies there. Another great writer, Eckhart Tolle, once said in a lecture (I’m paraphrasing) “So what if scientists solve life’s mysteries, solve the question of the universe, unravel the deepest secrets of Being itself? What then? What do they do with their time after that?” What he’s pointing to here is that we don’t really need any ‘more’ – and that the eternal pursuit of ‘more’ doesn’t bring us what we yearn for – even when we reach the pot of gold we’ll still be empty, and still want that hunger satiated. Our incessant quest for ‘more’ fuels only itself – it creates a hunger it can’t satisfy.

So no, we’re not happy yet. We can’t be. Like all addicts, we’re trying to fill a bucket that has no bottom, we’re trying to find happiness in something that doesn’t yield happiness. Dangerously, the process is self-fulfilling, much like pouring gasoline on a fire – the fire feeds on the fuel and burns ever brighter, rather than decreases.

Our culture clearly engenders individual addictions, but what is perhaps not so evident is that these are just manifestations of a greater, more systemic problem. The modern consumer culture spawns a need for ‘more’ that is society-wide. This addiction is every bit as destructive as the alcoholic’s disorder, it’s just transparent because the consumptive addict is better able to fit in to the patterns of everyday life within our society. Certainly, compulsive consumption is artificially fed through our cultures insane levels of advertising and marketing. Research numbers vary greatly, but the average American consumer is probably exposed to somewhere between 500 and a thousand commercial messages daily. Certainly, compulsive consumption is artificially fed through our cultures extreme level of advertising and marketing, etc. But what does that tell us? What is our culture if it’s not ourselves? Whilst not every ad we see may make us run out and devour that product, it does reinforce the notion that we need something ‘more’. Physchologist Alan Durning puts it this way: “Even if they (ads) fail to sell a particular product, they sell consumerism itself by ceaselessly reiterating the idea that there is a product to solve each of life’s problems, indeed that existence would be satisfying and complete if only we bought the right things.”

The outgrowth of this is a group of people who are literally consuming the planet. We’re not keeping up with the Jones’ any more. The Jones’ have fallen by the wayside a long time ago. We’re vainly trying to keep up with our own insatiable demands, and it’s not ever going to bring happiness to anyone.

All addiction is rooted in an attempt to change the way we feel. Addicts become, essentially, addicted to the feeling that the addiction brings, hence they are often so hard to break. What appears to be happening today is that we’ve become convinced that through consumption we can change the way we feel. And it works, albeit only temporarily. At least it FEELS like it works. A new purchase, a new high, a new achievement, a new job, etc and a promise that life is now somehow different

I don’t believe population alone is the problem here. I think our level and rate of consumption is every bit as destructive, if not more so, than mere the number of people walking around today. Consumerism is so deeply entrenched in our mindset today the minute someone suggests, even tentatively, that maybe we need to address this, they’re fired upon from all sides. As George Bush Sr told those representatives from several third world countries who asked him to consider reducing the consumption habits of the US: “The American way of life is not up for negotiation”. Or, as Senator Trent Lott told the Senate floor during a debate on whether or not the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be opened to drilling for oil, “I am not going to ask the American people to use less” or even better “The American people have a right to a great big road hog. And I’m gonna get me one.” This blind adherence to a particular ideology in the face of an incipient ecological crisis is every bit as much a function of addiction as the lung cancer patient sucking on a cigarette.

I don’t have the expertise, nor the time, to offer much recourse. Treatment of addiction is far more complicated than I’m able to grasp, and you probably aren’t interested in reading further anyway (if you’re still reading this at all). I have no training in the treatment of addiction, so the following is worth the money you’re paying to read it. From what little I understand, here’s a short and simplistic summary:

* All addictions require behavior modification. Whatever is available, be it 12 step programs, faith, legislation, family, etc – whatever it takes, the behavioral patterns need to cease – while they continue, the addict will continue to seek refuge in that behavior.

* Addicts require an acceptance, and embrace, of a higher power – something that has more power than the addict does.

* Addiction problems are intrinsically problems with boundaries. Addicts must come to learn how to accept and embrace boundaries.

* Newer methods of treatment revolve around the understanding that creating a safe, warm, loving environment for the addict will lead to the addict sharing what they understand to be the root of their addiction.

* Most mental health specialists believe there is no such thing as an “addictive personality” – addictions can be fueled by, among many other things, anxiety, depression, isolation, social pressures, physical chemistry, etc.

* One of the reasons treating addictions is so difficult is that addictions typically work so well for people. The gambler is, for a short while, comforted through gambling, the drunk through drinking, the sex addict through sex. The truth of the temporal nature of this relief is unknown, indeed unknowable, to the addict.

I think the million dollar question is whether or not we choose to do something about this. Do we acknowledge a problem and deal with it honestly, or do we continue to look askance at whoever suggests the problem lies within? That the problem is endemic to a social and cultural structure that motivates us to infinite consumption with promises of “a happy place, with flowery meadows, and rainbow skies and rivers made of chocolate, where the children dance and laugh and play with gumdrop smiles.” (paraphrased from the film, “Team America”) is clear, but, like most addicts, we typically refuse to see clearly, to own the addiction and move away from it. Addicts, via dependence, become incredibly resourceful at finding excuses for facilitating their addiction, and that blinds the addict from honestly accounting for their behavior. Addicts also have, fortunately, a world of people out there willing to support and foster their treatment and good health. We have each other and the natural world – we can choose to surrender to those around us and lend ourselves and the planet we live on to good health, or not.

Cheers

Carl

Hey Folks,

Well, just as I was winding down and about to go to bed, the news comes in. Lance Mackey wins the 2008 Iditarod. What an amazing achievement! He won the Yukon Quest and the Iditarod last year, and repeated both wins this year. 1100 miles down the frozen Yukon River, and virtually the same set of dogs wins the 1000 mile Iditarod. They said nobody could ever win both. He won both in 2007 and just won’ em again. Congrats Lance.

Jeff King, 4-time winner, is about an hour behind, and looks set to take 2nd place.

Cheers

Carl

PS - Here’s a Photo of Lance in the 2009 Race.

Hey Folks,

Another, possibly the last for now, from the Iditarod last weekend. The dogs can’t wait to get started, I swear its as if they count down with the starter, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and they leap into the traces. It’s amazing to me to think that the leaders are over halfway to Nome already. A few years back I was fortunate enough to spend some more time with the race, a few days out on the trail, which was a blast. Maybe one year I’ll get out to Nome for the finish. Until then, I’ll suffice with the excitement of the start of the Iditarod in Anchorage.

Cheers

Carl